Transparency boost in 3D printing

Each MSP offers a structured breakdown of a filament’s environmental characteristics. This includes data on polymer origin, percentage of recycled content, type of packaging used, and end-of-life guidance to help users understand disposal or recycling options. The profiles also list compliance with major environmental and quality standards, such as REACH, RoHS, ISO 9001, and ISO 14001.

Filamentive Material Sustainability Profile. Image via Filamentive.

Filamentive has designed the MSPs to be concise, visually clear, and easily comparable across materials, offering a consistent framework that addresses the lack of transparency and standardization typically found in 3D printing material specifications.

“In a landscape full of ambiguous green claims and vague terminology, we see an urgent need for greater clarity and accountability,” said Ravi Toor, Managing Director of Filamentive. “These profiles are a step towards more honest communication, empowering users to align purchasing decisions with environmental values.”

Survey conducted by Filamentive, 89% of respondents said sustainability is important to them. Image via Filamentive.

Currently, the profiles are available for Filamentive’s core material range, including PLA, PETg, ASA, and select engineering filaments. The company also plans to extend the initiative further by exploring Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) and Material Passport-inspired documentation.

While Filamentive acknowledges there’s still progress to be made, it sees this move as a meaningful step toward advancing a circular economy in 3D printing.

Industry push toward sustainability gains momentum

Filamentive’s launch joins a broader shift within the additive manufacturing sector to move beyond superficial green claims and toward measurable, data-backed sustainability. Recent research has emphasized the need for an adaptable, digitally driven life cycle in AM, one that maximizes printer utilization, exploits new materials and design methods, and fosters shared commitment among industry stakeholders.

A recent vision paper published by academic and industrial partners highlights that the environmental impact of 3D printing often depends less on the technology itself and more on how components are used. In aerospace, for example, lightweight AM parts can reduce fuel consumption and emissions over a product’s lifetime. But for other sectors, the benefits are less clear, making transparent data, life cycle assessments, and responsible material sourcing essential.

Calls for such rigor are increasingly echoed by organizations like the Additive Manufacturer Green Trade Association (AMGTA), as well as leading manufacturers. Stratasys, for instance, has committed to enhanced ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) practices in its 2024 sustainability report, while startups and designers are experimenting with regenerative techniques, such as those featured in WASP’s Formnext 2024 showcase.

Experts like Dr. Phil Reeves, a leading AM consultant and founder of the strategic advisory firm Reeves Insight, have cautioned against the dangers of greenwashing in additive manufacturing, highlighting the need to contextualize factors such as embedded carbon and energy use. As calls for greater accountability grow louder, transparency initiatives like Filamentive’s Material Sustainability Profiles are becoming increasingly relevant, offering a practical step toward the clearer communication and shared intent that researchers say are essential to the future of sustainable 3D printing.

What 3D printing trends should you watch out for in 2025?

How is the future of 3D printing shaping up?

3D printing on demand

Have parts to make? Get free instant quote today.

Get instant quote

*This article originally appeared on [3dprintingindustry]. [RODOLFO HERNANDEZ] is the original author of this piece.